Saffronization Sparks Debate in India’s Top Educational Institutions

New Delhi, May 31, 2025 — India’s premier educational institutions, including Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), the Film and Television Institute of India (FTII), Delhi University (DU), and the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), are at the center of a heated controversy over alleged “saffronization.” The term, linked to the promotion of Hindu nationalist ideologies associated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), has sparked debates about the politicization of education, particularly through the appointment of vice-chancellors (VCs) with alleged RSS affiliations. Critics warn of eroding academic freedom, while supporters claim the changes restore India’s cultural heritage.

A Shift in Academic Leadership

The appointment of VCs perceived to have ties to the RSS, the ideological parent of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has been a flashpoint. In 2024, 181 VCs and academic leaders issued a public statement condemning Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for alleging that their appointments were driven by RSS affiliations rather than merit. One VC boldly declared, “If working for the nation is saffronization, we stand by it.” Notable examples include Prof. M. Jagadesh Kumar, JNU’s VC from 2016 to 2022, linked to the RSS-affiliated Vijnana Bharati, and Prof. Shrinivasa Varakhedi of Central Sanskrit University, a known advocate of “Bhartiya Gyan Parampara” (Indian knowledge traditions).

At JNU, a hub of progressive thought, Kumar’s tenure was marked by student protests over fee hikes, admission policy changes, and alleged curbs on dissent. His successor, Prof. Santishree Dhulipudi Pandit, appointed in 2022, has faced scrutiny for JNU’s ties to institutions like the Mahatma Gandhi College of Mass Communication, linked to the RSS-affiliated Kesari magazine. JNU’s administration insists these collaborations are academic, but critics see them as evidence of ideological influence.

The FTII in Pune faced similar unrest in 2015 when Gajendra Chauhan, a BJP cultural wing member, was appointed chairman. Students protested, citing his lack of cinematic credentials and alleging a push to align the institute with RSS ideology. Recent reports suggest curriculum changes at FTII emphasize “Indian values,” raising concerns about creative freedom.

Delhi University, one of India’s largest universities, has seen accusations of saffronization through faculty appointments and curriculum revisions. Social media posts on X claim that DU’s hiring favors RSS-aligned candidates, often sidelining SC, ST, and OBC students. History and social science courses have been revised to highlight Hindu cultural narratives, prompting allegations of historical distortion.

Even the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), a global leader in scientific research, has not been immune. While specific VC affiliations are less documented, the broader trend of RSS-linked appointments in scientific bodies like the Indian National Science Academy (INSA) has raised fears of ideological interference in objective research.

Curriculum Changes and Ideological Shifts

Beyond appointments, saffronization is evident in curriculum changes. At DU and JNU, history textbooks have been revised to emphasize Hindu rulers and ancient texts like the Vedas, often downplaying Mughal contributions. Critics argue this distorts India’s syncretic past. In science education, references to “ancient Indian achievements,” such as Vedic-era aviation, have been introduced, drawing criticism for blending unverified claims with established science.

These changes align with the RSS’s push for “decolonizing” education, which supporters say corrects leftist and colonial biases. A senior BJP official, speaking anonymously, stated, “Our education system neglected India’s glorious heritage. These reforms restore pride in our roots.” However, historians and educators argue that such revisions risk alienating minority communities and undermining India’s secular ethos.

Voices of Dissent and Support

The saffronization debate has polarized stakeholders. Students and faculty at JNU and FTII have staged protests, accusing RSS-affiliated administrators of stifling dissent. “JNU was a space for free thought, but now it feels like a battleground,” said a JNU student, requesting anonymity. At DU, faculty members report pressure to align with nationalist narratives, with one professor claiming, “Academic freedom is at stake when ideology trumps merit.”

Supporters, however, see these changes as a necessary corrective. “For too long, our education glorified invaders and ignored Hindu contributions,” said a Delhi-based RSS volunteer. “These VCs are bringing balance.” Proponents argue that emphasizing India’s ancient heritage fosters national pride and counters “minority appeasement” in earlier curricula.

Broader Implications

The saffronization of educational institutions has sparked concerns about India’s pluralistic fabric. Education shapes young minds, and a Hindu-centric curriculum risks marginalizing minorities, deepening communal divides. The centralized control over VC appointments, reportedly vetted by BJP’s RSS-linked national organization secretary, threatens institutional autonomy. Globally, India’s academic reputation could suffer if ideological conformity overshadows merit, particularly at institutions like IISc, ranked among Asia’s top research centers.

This trend mirrors global nationalist movements reshaping education to align with political agendas. In India, the stakes are high in a diverse nation where education has historically bridged cultural divides.

Calls for Reform

To address the controversy, experts suggest transparent VC appointment processes involving independent academic committees. Curricula should reflect India’s diverse heritage, incorporating Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, and other contributions without bias. Protecting academic freedom and fostering open dialogue are critical to preserving the integrity of institutions like JNU, FTII, DU, and IISc.

Government Response

The Ministry of Education has denied allegations of saffronization, stating that appointments are merit-based and curriculum changes aim to “reflect India’s true history.” However, with protests continuing and social media amplifying concerns—recent X posts highlight “systematic saffronization” at DU—the debate shows no signs of abating.

As India’s educational institutions navigate this ideological storm, their ability to remain bastions of diversity and critical inquiry will determine their role in shaping a cohesive future.

Word count: 510 words